Austin On Two Wheels Rotating Header Image

Velib in trouble? Perhaps they could learn a few things from Austin CarShare.

I was reading a BikePortland story yesterday about the Velib system, and was dismayed to hear that the operator, advertising company JCDecaux, had recently stated the system was in dire straits. To quote the original BBC story:

Remi Pheulpin, JCDecaux’s director general, says the current contract is unsustainable. “It’s simple. All the receipts go to the city. All the expenses are ours,” he said.

The costs, he said, were “so high that a private business cannot handle it alone, espcially as it’s a problem of public order. If we want the velib set-up to keep going, we’ll have to change the business model,”

And yes, there is some mistreatment of Velib bikes going on. And that should be expected! When these bikes have been used for 42 million trips, not all of them are going to be gentle.

Now, the real truth here seems to be that ad revenues are down all over the place because of the worldwide economic troubles, and JCDecaux is really making some kind of political play to get more money from the city. Streetsblog agrees, saying:

So is Vélib destined to burn brightly only to flare out after a short time? Hardly. Vélib is here to stay, according to officials and transportation experts familiar with the details of its operations. The BBC’s portrayal of a mortal threat, they say, is best understood as a negotiating ploy on the part of JCDecaux. (Note that the JCDecaux representative is the only source quoted in that story.)

“Decaux is using media sensationalism in order to obtain more money from the city of Paris,” said Denis Baupin, who as Deputy Mayor for Transportation oversaw the Vélib launch in the summer of 2007.

Nevertheless, we think there are a few things that Velib could learn from Austin CarShare about operations. Both Elliott and I were directly involved in starting Austin CarShare, Austin’s non-profit carshare service.

First and foremost seems to be the issue of mishandling the bicycles and theft. While Velib customers currently pay a 150-euro deposit, they apparently aren’t billed for damages incurred while their bicycle is checked out. They should be. Since a credit card is swiped each time a bike is taken, it should be easy to find which person stole a bicycle or failed to lock one up correctly, which person has abused a bike, and bill them accordingly!

Secondly, it seems that JCDecaux is not taking the real operating costs of their system into account. While the actual rate of incidents is low, the initial deposit should perhaps be made to better reflect that damages that the bikes are incurring. Since it’s only a bicycle, it might not even be bad to make the initial deposit the entire cost of replacing the bike – 400 euros.

Even with all the costs, the system is worth it, in my opinion, for the quality of life they add – and much of that can’t be quantified. Here are a couple more videos about the system.


e² transport – Paris: Vélo Liberté from kontentreal on Vimeo.

Ecovelo also had a bit to say on this issue.

Related posts:

  1. City of Austin launches staff bike share program ...
  2. Learn to build your own frames from Doug Fattic ...
  3. Hertz Carsharing service growing rapidly ...
  4. Bike Infrastructure: What we can learn from Seattle ...
  5. Learn to road race like a pro: Super Squadra training camp coming in January ...

3 Comments on “Velib in trouble? Perhaps they could learn a few things from Austin CarShare.”

  1. #1 JP
    on Feb 16th, 2009 at 8:25 am

    I agree that Decaux is making up these numbers to make the situation sound worse than it really is. One thing that I don’t understand is why these bikes cost 400 euros a piece. They’re not THAT great. They’re extrememly heavy and have the maneuverability of a water buffalo.

    How they’re going missing is really beyond me. Unless they are physically being ripped out of the stands, then certainly the card holder would be charged. That’s how the scheme is supposed to work.

    As far as billing for damages to the last rider. It’s too difficult to prove. Imagine that you’ve just returned a bike, and you were very careful with it. You park it and walk away. Now some yob walks by, slices the seat, slashes the tires and kicks the spokes in. Should YOU get charged for this?

    What’s really mysterious is how 10,000 bikes just go missing. How about hiring a security guard for a week for 5/euros an hour to watch the stands where most of the problems are occuring.

    All around this sounds like a money grab. Everyone has bailout fever.

  2. #2 Doug
    on Feb 16th, 2009 at 10:45 am

    `There’s no 4×4 better than a rental car!’

  3. #3 marcus
    on Feb 16th, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    Well, 400 euros isn’t really that much, but yes, this is just really about JC Decaux crying for more public money.

Leave a Comment

Subscribe to a comments feed for this story (RSS)