Austin On Two Wheels Rotating Header Image

Book Review: Pedaling Revolution, by Jeff Mapes

Forward, Comrades!

Forward, Comrades!

Summary: A look at the growing urban bike culture in the United States and Europe, with a special emphasis on the personalities involved.

Rating: 5/5

Availability: Order it from Powell’s if you want to feel authentic. Otherwise you could go for the usual, Amazon.

“I often saw cyclists running red lights, riding the wrong direction on one-way streets, and weaving through thickets of pedestrians with abandon. And did I mention that no one is wearing a bike helmet?”

“Wolters was surprisingly adamant in dismissing the notion that the police should target cyclists or pedestrians who violate traffic laws (with the exception of the requirement that cyclists have lights at night; the police do regard that as important and well worth enforcing). The target of the police is not to control cyclists and pedestrians,” he said. “It is to control the most dangerous part, motorcar drivers.” (emphasis added)

These words from Jack Wolters, traffic safety officer in Amsterdam are pretty surprising to American ears, especially after our recent meeting with the Austin Police Chief. On top of that, our own draft bicycle plan agrees with APD to an extent. Here though, Jeff Mapes has found a completely different opinion.

The dangerous vehicles on the road are the cars and trucks, not the cyclists.

This is not a radical’s book, necessarily. Pedaling Revolution is written by a newspaper reporter, and for the most part it feels like reporting. That’s not to say the book is dry by any means but you will certainly get a lot of facts thrown at you in 276 pages. A lot.

Jeff Mapes is an Oregon reporter who covers politics and cycling issues (sounds familiar) at OregonLive. Bike Portland has a bit more of a look into their hometown guy in their own review of Pedaling Revolution.

For the most part Pedaling Revolution feels like a long series of in-depth interviews mingled with the Author’s own experiences traveling to Europe and back home in Portland, Los Angeles, New York, Davis, California, and other “cycling meccas.”

Some of the best and most enthusiastically written portions cover, of course, Jeff Mapes’ own city of Portland where he focuses in on several of the notable bike culture personalities such as “Reverend Phil.”

I wouldn’t try to read this book in one sitting. It’s best digested in small portions and then kept around later almost as a “bike culture reference” of sorts just for all of the raw facts (and contact names!) you’ll find. For a cycling advocate this book is a must read. For others, maybe not so much. If you aren’t interested in all the details, names, and history in our growing bike culture, then you may not like this book at all.

Me? I’m a bike geek I guess. I loved this book and I’m keeping it. Go get your own copy!

3 Comments on “Book Review: Pedaling Revolution, by Jeff Mapes”

  1. #1 Dave
    on Mar 8th, 2009 at 8:17 pm

    One of the interesting things I’ve realized lately, is the hypocrisy of the “authorities” regarding bicyclists’ safety. They would have us believe that obeying the letter of the law (in particular with regard to stop signs) will make us “safe”. In actuality, it doesn’t have much to do with our safety at all. What it is related to is motorist irritation. (Do I need to add that there are some suicidal cyclists, just like there are crazy drivers?) Motorists are deeply irritated these days due to the high levels of traffic, and they are mostly upset with each other, but bicyclists are a much easier target for their irritation.
    In actuality, the safety of bicyclists is almost never taken into consideration in the design of roadways, or in the enforcement of traffic laws.
    The remarks of the traffic safety officer in Amsterdam reflect the essential reality: bicyclists are the victims, and motorists are the victimizers, yet the underlying attitude here is that the cyclist is undoubtedly at fault, not that the operator of the lethal machine has the onus of responsibility to drive safely.
    Experience shows that bicycling safety mostly revolves around being seen, and acting predictably, consistent with traffic laws. From that perspective, I totally agree with Wolters emphasis on bicycle lighting at night: drivers must at least have a chance to see us!

  2. #2 elliott
    on Mar 8th, 2009 at 9:11 pm

    Shhh! Don’t tell Mike Dahmus.

  3. #3 M1EK
    on Apr 9th, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    “They would have us believe that obeying the letter of the law (in particular with regard to stop signs) will make us “safe”.”

    and

    “Experience shows that bicycling safety mostly revolves around being seen, and acting predictably, consistent with traffic laws.”

    Make up your mind which one you want.

    Ssh!

Leave a Comment

Subscribe to a comments feed for this story (RSS)