<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ALERT: Senate Transportation Committee on Safe Passing Bill Postponed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://austinontwowheels.org/2009/03/10/alert-senate-transportation-committee-on-safe-passing-bill-postponed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://austinontwowheels.org/2009/03/10/alert-senate-transportation-committee-on-safe-passing-bill-postponed/</link>
	<description>The Online Magazine of Austin Cycling Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:04:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: elliott</title>
		<link>http://austinontwowheels.org/2009/03/10/alert-senate-transportation-committee-on-safe-passing-bill-postponed/comment-page-1/#comment-2401</link>
		<dc:creator>elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austinontwowheels.org/?p=4515#comment-2401</guid>
		<description>Jim, the arguments made for the voter ID bill are the same as those used to justify poll taxes and literacy test and the results are the same.

So are you saying only people who own a car and drive can vote? Where does it say we are all required to get government ID cards? You are assuming everyone has the means to pay for and ID card which is a defacto poll tax. If you are going to take someone&#039;s rights away or make it more difficult to exercise their right to vote, so me some evidence that there is actually a problem. Otherwise, let&#039;s have the LEge get back to trying doing what they seem to enjoy: tearing down the barriers between church and state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, the arguments made for the voter ID bill are the same as those used to justify poll taxes and literacy test and the results are the same.</p>
<p>So are you saying only people who own a car and drive can vote? Where does it say we are all required to get government ID cards? You are assuming everyone has the means to pay for and ID card which is a defacto poll tax. If you are going to take someone&#8217;s rights away or make it more difficult to exercise their right to vote, so me some evidence that there is actually a problem. Otherwise, let&#8217;s have the LEge get back to trying doing what they seem to enjoy: tearing down the barriers between church and state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://austinontwowheels.org/2009/03/10/alert-senate-transportation-committee-on-safe-passing-bill-postponed/comment-page-1/#comment-2399</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austinontwowheels.org/?p=4515#comment-2399</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s bunk.  What literacy tests and poll taxes are you talking about?  I&#039;m a lifelong Democratic voter, but the show ID bill makes perfect sense to me.  

We don&#039;t take people&#039;s word for it that they are 21 at the grocery store trying to buy alcohol.  We don&#039;t take people&#039;s word for it if you are trying to legally enter the US, you have to have a visa and a passport.

So what&#039;s so different here?  The idea that this is disenfranchisement is a non-starter.  If people can&#039;t be bothered to keep their driver&#039;s license from expiring, then that&#039;s their fault.  If people&#039;s drivers&#039; licenses are revoked or suspended, they can get a plain ID card at DPS.  If they get married or divorced, they can take their marriage license or divorce decree to the DPS office and apply for a new driver&#039;s license.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s bunk.  What literacy tests and poll taxes are you talking about?  I&#8217;m a lifelong Democratic voter, but the show ID bill makes perfect sense to me.  </p>
<p>We don&#8217;t take people&#8217;s word for it that they are 21 at the grocery store trying to buy alcohol.  We don&#8217;t take people&#8217;s word for it if you are trying to legally enter the US, you have to have a visa and a passport.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s so different here?  The idea that this is disenfranchisement is a non-starter.  If people can&#8217;t be bothered to keep their driver&#8217;s license from expiring, then that&#8217;s their fault.  If people&#8217;s drivers&#8217; licenses are revoked or suspended, they can get a plain ID card at DPS.  If they get married or divorced, they can take their marriage license or divorce decree to the DPS office and apply for a new driver&#8217;s license.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elliott</title>
		<link>http://austinontwowheels.org/2009/03/10/alert-senate-transportation-committee-on-safe-passing-bill-postponed/comment-page-1/#comment-2394</link>
		<dc:creator>elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austinontwowheels.org/?p=4515#comment-2394</guid>
		<description>Yes, I&#039;m sure they only doing this out of the kindness of their hearts kind of like how literacy tests and poll taxes are just part of &quot;citizenship.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;m sure they only doing this out of the kindness of their hearts kind of like how literacy tests and poll taxes are just part of &#8220;citizenship.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://austinontwowheels.org/2009/03/10/alert-senate-transportation-committee-on-safe-passing-bill-postponed/comment-page-1/#comment-2393</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austinontwowheels.org/?p=4515#comment-2393</guid>
		<description>Texas Republicans do not have &#039;plans to disenfranchise voters&#039; any more than Democrats have &#039;plans to conduct voter fraud.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas Republicans do not have &#8216;plans to disenfranchise voters&#8217; any more than Democrats have &#8216;plans to conduct voter fraud.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

