Austin On Two Wheels Rotating Header Image

Bike Infrastructure: What we can learn from Seattle

Over the July 4th holiday, I visited Seattle to see some family, but I also took my travel bike with me to get in some riding and test the new Versa Shifters for internal hub (review coming later this week.) Now that I have been back in Austin for a few weeks, I’ve reflected on what we can learn from Seattle as we try to build a world class cycling city.

Seattle is a lot like Austin in many ways. Both cities have natural beauty and a strong environmental movement to defend this asset. Both also give a lot of lip service to this movement but fall way short of actually implementing these ideals. We seem to like the idea of being green but don’t want to make the changes and sacrifices to truly make our cities sustainable. Similarly, in the cycling community there is a conflict between the mainstream, more recreational focused Cascade Bicycle Club and those wanting more radical change. I have seen a similar dynamic with the Austin Cycling Association here as well.

When it comes to making biking a form of transportation equal to others, Seattle is leaps ahead of us though. While no Portland bike nirvana, bike lanes and sharrows abound everywhere creating space on the road for cyclists. I did about 100 miles of riding throughout the city and found only a handful of problem intersections for cyclists. The driving culture is quite different in Seattle with drivers going out of their way to yield to cyclists and pedestrians. In fact, you have to be careful if you are just standing on a street corner as you can bring traffic to a screeching halt when drivers think you are trying to cross. That is something I wish we could export to our car-is-king state. It certainly makes riding on the street very pleasant and much more welcoming to the novice.

Not that you need to do much riding on the street. The best thing Seattle has done for cycling is create hundreds of miles of bike paths throughout the city. By creating car-free connections to major points in the city, Seattle has lowered the perceived safety barrier for cyclists. This allows those less comfortable in traffic including children to still get places by bike and also provides a place for people in the neighborhood stroll, walk the dog, or jog as well. I think these paths are key to creating the kind of volume of cyclist I saw during rush hour.

As we look at possible additional bike paths, I think here are some key points to learn from this. First of all, the bike paths go somewhere, not just in a circle. This helps serve both recreational and transportation needs for the path making it an asset for more of the community. Also since bike paths use relatively little space, we can use strips of land or right of way in many cases. Seattle’s trails sometimes cuts through unused spots of industrial land to connect to neighborhood. Not every inch of a bike path has to be scenic to be useful. Finally, all of their paths are paved. We have used packed granite paths for the most part, probably as a cost savings, but having paved paths makes a real difference in creating thoroughfares for all types of bikes, not just mountain bikes and hybrids. Again, this puts the focus on transportation over recreation but still maintains the dual use.

As you see the hundreds of cyclists on the trails and streets, you can see that Seattlites take their cycling for transportation seriously. The road bike is king with lots of touring bikes and European style city bikes as well. Despite the natural setting, I saw very few mountain bikes or their spawn, the hybrid. Without having read my Transportation Bike Picker, the cycling masses have gravitated towards bikes that are practical for transportation.

In fairness, Seattle has been seriously plugging away a at this stuff longer than we have and are working to improve all the time. In my family’s neighborhood, there were new sharrows in the main street since my last visit. We have a great Bicycle/Pedestrian department that are working feverishly to improve our infrastructure. I think we should take what works there, especially the bike paths, into consideration as we implement our improvements.

5 Comments on “Bike Infrastructure: What we can learn from Seattle”

  1. #1 Bikin' Bibliotecaria
    on Jul 21st, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    I don’t think of it as “sacrifices” we have to make to have a greener city, but rather as TRADE-OFFS. For example, if someone says, “take the bus instead of driving your car,” that sounds like a sacrifice; but, if you suggest, “take the bus in exchange for a stronger sense of community and less pollution in the air,” that is a trade-off, and one I’m happy to make.

  2. #2 elliott
    on Jul 21st, 2009 at 10:55 pm

    Good point.

  3. #3 Michael
    on Jul 22nd, 2009 at 1:30 pm

    That’s a good way of putting it.

  4. #4 M.J.
    on Jul 22nd, 2009 at 2:36 pm

    Hi Elliott,

    Glad you saw some good work here in Seattle, but there is much more to do. We at Cascade Bicycle Club worked hard to see passage of the city’s first Bicycle Master Plan, then followed up by lobbying even hard to persuade voters to approve funding via a 5-year property tax levy. For without funds, a plan sits on a shelf. The plan also gives us a way to hold the city accountable to improving the bike infrastructure.

    Bike paths (multi-use trails) are great, especially for novice riders looking to use their bicycles for transportation for the first time. But Cascade certainly views roads (sharrows, bike lanes, bike boulevards) as essential cycling infrastructure, too. New trails are difficult to carve out of the limited resource of land and public right of way. At the moment, we’re going through yet another round of lawsuits about completing the “Missing Link” of the Burke-Gilman Trail: http://www.cascade.org/Advocacy/missing_link.cfm

    Just for point of clarification, there may be friction in “the bike community,” and some of what you heard/felt may be from the misperception that Cascade is a recreational club. Though recreational riding is a component of what the organization offers, we’re most actively involved in advocacy, commuting and education work. The large recreational cycling events Cascade produces (STP, Chilly Hilly, etc) are important fundraisers for our other work. This includes activities such as teaching bike education in public schools, evaluating and shaping regional transportation plans and lobbying elected officials for bicycling improvements and cyclists’ rights.

    As for MTB, next time you’re in town, check out the I5 Colonnade, created through much hard work of the Evergreen Mountain Bike Alliance. It’s not wilderness, but the park offers technical riding right in the city. Pretty awesome! http://evergreenmtb.org/colonnade/

    Thanks for listening…

    M.J. Kelly
    Cascade Bicycle Club

  5. #5 elliott
    on Jul 22nd, 2009 at 4:10 pm

    M.J.
    I was relaying a perception I got from other people in the cycling community. As I said, it is something I’ve seen here as well with the Austin Cycling Association, our largest club which has done many similar things to your organization in our community. Any movement has Bolsheviks and Mensheviks, and there is a place for both. Those impatient for change may view your work as too slow or giving in too easily. On the other hand, political leadership probably listen to you or find it easier to meet with you on critical issues. It is is the nature of things.

    Thanks for the recommendation on the mountain biking, but I’m strictly a roadie (except for the odd cyclocross race.)

Leave a Comment

Subscribe to a comments feed for this story (RSS)