Safety seems to be the biggest concern.
Advocates for reverse-angle parking make several arguments:
It’s safer to pull into traffic pointing forward, with the driver getting a clear look to the left for oncoming traffic.
It’s safer for passing bicyclists. While a cyclist would lose the advantage of seeing brake lights of a car backing out, the driver in a reverse-angle parked car would be less likely to pull out and hit a bicycle.
Given the position of opened doors in a reverse-angle parked car, children or dogs exiting would be funneled toward the sidewalk rather than toward passing traffic.
A trunk adjacent to a sidewalk is safer to unload than one thta is facing traffic.
Getting the bike lane withou having to worry about getting doored is a big boon. The City will also begin charging for this previously free parking leading hopefully to more people riding.
Related posts:
- City open house on bike lanes on West 6th tonight! ...
- Portland Construction Company sets up temporary bike only lanes during projects ...
- LOBV adds staff, Bike-in Movies with Beer, and update on City bike projects ...
- November Update from City of Austin on bike infrastructure improvements ...
- Signs of new bike infrastructure popping up in South Austin ...













on Jul 29th, 2009 at 2:53 am
that street a prime candidate for bike infrastructure. lots of people ride it. and it’s no fun. whenever i was on it, i’d get off it as quickly as i could.