<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Film Fun: Contraflow Cycle Path</title>
	<atom:link href="http://austinontwowheels.org/2010/04/02/friday-film-fun-contraflowcyclepath/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://austinontwowheels.org/2010/04/02/friday-film-fun-contraflowcyclepath/</link>
	<description>The Online Magazine of Austin Cycling Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:04:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: M1EK</title>
		<link>http://austinontwowheels.org/2010/04/02/friday-film-fun-contraflowcyclepath/comment-page-1/#comment-7665</link>
		<dc:creator>M1EK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austinontwowheels.org/?p=8803#comment-7665</guid>
		<description>I voted against bike lanes on Guad/Lavaca on the UTC back in the early &#039;00s by the way. Downhill there&#039;s no need; uphill the whole lane would be needed anyways; so sharrows are, indeed, the perfect facility here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I voted against bike lanes on Guad/Lavaca on the UTC back in the early &#8217;00s by the way. Downhill there&#8217;s no need; uphill the whole lane would be needed anyways; so sharrows are, indeed, the perfect facility here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natrius</title>
		<link>http://austinontwowheels.org/2010/04/02/friday-film-fun-contraflowcyclepath/comment-page-1/#comment-7649</link>
		<dc:creator>natrius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 06:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austinontwowheels.org/?p=8803#comment-7649</guid>
		<description>Guadalupe and Lavaca are perfect as is. Since the sharrows were added, I&#039;ve had maybe one hostile interaction with a car on those streets. They were more frequent before. Drivers expect me to take the entire lane and don&#039;t get mad about it. They just switch lanes and go around like they&#039;re supposed to. Bike lanes would lead to &gt; 35 mph zooming by me at close range instead of half a traffic lane away.

Bike lanes are probably more effective at attracting new riders, but new riders will probably never use Guadalupe and Lavaca downtown regardless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guadalupe and Lavaca are perfect as is. Since the sharrows were added, I&#8217;ve had maybe one hostile interaction with a car on those streets. They were more frequent before. Drivers expect me to take the entire lane and don&#8217;t get mad about it. They just switch lanes and go around like they&#8217;re supposed to. Bike lanes would lead to &gt; 35 mph zooming by me at close range instead of half a traffic lane away.</p>
<p>Bike lanes are probably more effective at attracting new riders, but new riders will probably never use Guadalupe and Lavaca downtown regardless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

